I Hate Luv Storys - Reviews

Bollywood love stories are known to magic to create the fund, and "I Hate Luv installed a ceiling'is no exception. I Hate installed Luv one of the debutant director PUNIT Malhotra star Imran Khan and Sonam Kapoor. The film is old wine in new bottles, because it is not very different story. ideas and romantic sequences of the film is borrowed from the former to make love stories. Only the Director's treatment of age-old theme that makes the film worth seeing!

I Hate Luv installed between the roof of the story of Jay (Imran Khan) and Simran (Sonam Kapoor), two people are different as chalk and cheese. Simran's tough love and romantic love stories so much that her own life begins to resemble one. He lives in a paradise-loving friend (Samir Dattani), and a good job of production designer. His dream is in danger when he was with Jay, a cynic who believes in everything collides, but love! Jay hates love stories. Things take a turn for the worse, if he do assistant director (Samir Soni), a famous director to love stories veer, Simran is working.

Who can pull the film parallels Mills and Boon novel and film. PUNIT Malhotra has done a commendable job as a writer. His characterization of the Jay and Simran is also fine. PUNIT but could do a better writer than some of the other characters in the movie does not seem to be complete. Vishal-Shekhar have done exemplary work to create a musical footsteps of the film. Salim-Sulaiman's background score is top notch. Ayananka Bose is a great proof of his ability to re-plot of the film after the dragon. Styling by Manish Malhotra is a stylish and classic.

Imran Khan's easy, and care has really captured the spirit of Jay is a marquee. Sonam Kapoor will take you on a complete surprise, because it shows, in full, a new perspective on yourself as an actor. SIMRAN their role is very different from what he describes as his earlier films, Delhi 6 and Saanwariya. His transition from Plain Jane to glam chic is very pleased audience. Imran and Sonam illustrate the crackling chemistry on screen. Samir Dattani is good. Samir Soni to live up to his seniority as an actor and plays his role in a very. As Imran Kavin Dave's PAL has made a great job. Other Pooja Ghai, Ketaki Dave, Anju Mahendru are fair enough. Overall, the "I Hate Luv installed a ceiling'is a young film leads to a number of additional lots of freshness to the story and the plot of the film.

Dhoom 2 - Movie Review

Dhoom 2, released in November 24, 2006, was such a success that he had a very successful opening in India and abroad. In the U.S. alone, he won U.S. $ 2642290 at the beginning of 2007. Dhoom 2 is a great film that has sold a decent story line if it takes place. Instead, the film has spent much time and effort in all aspects of commercialism in the form of voice, entertainment, glamor, songs, etc.

Some may have a good story or plot to be the most important thing to watch in a film. Perhaps not too be expected, since the purpose of a movie intended to entertain in different ways (drama, glamor, music, film, publishing, etc.), except a good story. If people just keep waiting for good stories of the film, they might as well read a good novel instead.

Again, the Director shall not have missed the story so much so that the critics come with long lists to highlight any errors that are so visible throughout the film.

History:

As mentioned earlier, the story is not really been aware. To their mysterious, who calls himself Mr. A (Hrithik Roshan), is literally around the world priceless artifacts stolen very sophisticated. The goal of behavior is not explained. In pursuit of an ACP, Assistant Commissioner of Police (played by Abhishek Bachan) and then follow along the way, Mr. A is a willing partner Sunehri (Aishwarya Rai), whom he later discovers that it is sent to spy. She discovered later that she fell for him in a way typical of Bollywood and join hands with him after that.

The call of each star player was highlighted by their respective opening scenes, which may seem unnecessary to most viewers. In fact, most of the unnecessary scenes, but that's because history is not subject to this film at all.

Scenario:

Fun and entertainment is mainly the most attention in this film. This film is taken right in some commercially attractive from the beginning to the bitter end. Probably this is attributed to its success.

Eye Candy Comes of Aishwarya Rai and Bipasha Basu are part of the animation is simply intended to divert attention from the audience wonder what the story is about.

Uday Chopra is the most important entertainment, as he made his comic antics to keep a smile on her face public.

Movie:

The films are fantastic. Each scene flight is well taken care of camera angles and shots.

Video editing:

Video editing is very well done, although more than this could be achieved when the film is made solely for entertainment.

Singham - A Bolluwood Movie review

Bollywood is making progress in film industry very rapidly. Thats why all the world has started watching its movies and reviews.Reviews are good to read before watching movies.Remember the phase that Bollywood suffered in the 80's? When action films were released with factory-like precision, each more mindless and insensitive than the other? Yes, the ones where the villains were uhm... unattractive and threatened more and acted less. Heroes went around bashing up 20 goons at a time and came out staggering unscathed, and heroines did nothing better than looking pretty for the hero, when he took a break from fighting. Singham is that kind of a movie.
Bajirao Singham (Ajay) is a cop with a heart, happy in his village Shivghad where everyone is ready to lay down their lives for him. Singham is generally an angry young man, when it comes to petty criminals. However, at some point he crosses path with the bad man Jaykant Shikre (Prakash), who passes his time kidnapping and killing children with bare hands and doing such evil stuff just for the heck of it. The story is about how Singham manages to triumph over Shikre, with of course a romantic track with girlfriend Kaavya (Kajal) thrown in.
Singham is a really brave man, and this is established through his dance moves, which embarrassingly include him flexing his fingers like a lion's claws and also, random roars in the background when he is about to strike someone. Those of you who still haven't got it, a brave man likes being compared to a lion and would go to any lengths to prove that fact.
The story starts with a lot of promise as an honest cop kills himself after failing to prove that he's not corrupt and his widow runs from pillar to post to get the truth out. But later the film peters down. The treatment is shoddy, background music is outdated (in fact, I almost expected to hear dishoom dishoom like in the 80's during the fights), the dialogues are unbelievably tacky and generally the film is tiring.
Ajay Devgn, of course, is a treat to watch. With that bod and that strut and of course those intense eyes, he is convincing as someone who can fly in the air and bring baddies down with one strike of his hand. But Prakash Raj needs to be told to take it easy and not spend all his acting skills in one movie. He talks non-stop and is all over the place. In fact, every one in this noisy film, including Ashok Saraf and Sachin Khedekar have mile long dialogues.
Kajal Agarwal is pretty. Period. This is the kind of movie, where anyone and everyone can walk into the Home Minister's office, abuse him and give him a kick in the rear. And if you do that, the minister's peon will honour you with a salute. Nothing turns director Rohit Shetty on more than cars meeting mid air. We all know that by now. And this film has some breath taking action sequences, too. That's about it.s

RANGO - Latest Movie Review

RANGO isn’t just a chameleon struggling with his identity; it’s also a movie that struggles to find its true identity. One thing the film does not struggle with is amazing animation full of lavishly detailed sets and characters. I wanted to love the film which sold me on the basic level of an animal known for its ability to change color also being able to change his personality on a whim. Sadly, in the end RANGO just felt a little too disjointed for me to be able to sink my teeth in to.

The film begins as the nameless chameleon (Johnny Depp) is acting out scenes in a fish tank on the back of a car before a near accident sends his tank flying on to the cement, leaving the animal to fend for himself in the desert. Once he stumbles upon a town suffering from a severe shortage of water he find a name for himself and lies his way into becoming the towns sheriff. As the unlikely law of the town Rango somehow sniffs out something fishy about the sudden disappearance of all the water in town and seeks to do something about it.

It’s actually quite tough to ever have to admit not loving every aspect of a computer animated movie. It’s even tougher to admit when a movie is as visually stunning as RANGO is. The animation in RANGO is absolutely mesmerizing. The color palette is brilliant; the scene details are astounding as are the character models. Not a single character or set piece in this movie is lackluster or simple. The amount of detail is Pixar level or perhaps even better and the movements of the character bring them to life in such a way that at times look damn near lifelike. It’s such a shame to me that everything else just did not click with me.

I’m extremely conflicted about my feelings here because the animation had me in awe, the voice acting is top notch even if I’m not the world’s biggest Johnny Depp advocate, and even the sound design was very impressive. When it comes down to it though, nothing jumped out at me and made me care about the story or the characters themselves outside of the animation. I loved the way everything looked and moved, but I could just as easily watch the film on mute and get the same enjoyment out of it (aside from missing the sound design). It wasn’t until Rattlesnake Jake (Bill Nighy) came into the picture that I was really getting into it and even that is a very small portion of the film.

Looking back I don’t hate the story by any means, I just didn’t find that the writers and director presented in such a way that I could really immerse myself in it. I was too distracted and in love with the visuals to care much about anything else that anytime anything cool animation wise happened that my mind focused on those aspects far more. I also feel like the film jumped around in tone quite a bit which since I was so transfixed on the visuals that jumping from place to place so quickly had me feeling like I was suffering from ADHD.

A fantastic cast was assembled to bring these characters alive and each to a great job I just feel like they all live in the shadow of animation that outshines the script by a long shot. I did laugh here and there at some of the quirky sensibilities, but I never found RANGO to be inherently funny, exciting or even dramatic on any serious level.

As much as it pains me to give an animated movie my less than favorable opinion I just couldn’t bring myself to say I liked RANGO. I don’t hate it, because I loved it in regards to the look everything else just made me shrug my shoulders. I feel parts of it are a little too mean spirited and dark for children, but a little too quirky and simple for lots of adults. I don’t begrudge the opinions of anyone who will and have loved it because I can fully understand how someone could. For me though, RANGO despite the spectacular animation struggled at finding any kind of identity.

Chillar Party – Movie Review with Suggestions

You have seen many websites about movies reviews but this blog give you reviews with suggestion about wether you should watch movie or not.At one point in American history, dogs and blacks were not allowed in public places. During the British occupation of China, it was ‘dogs and Chinese’ while at the first Mumbai marathon the rule was against dogs and wheelchairs. A dog has thus become a metaphor for seclusion, for denying someone their fundamental rights.

“Chillar Party” uses this metaphor in a brilliant, but hilariously entertainment manner to make a statement against those who seclude, be it Shiv Sena in Mumbai, fanatic Hindus who want Muslims out of India, or upper class Hindus who refuse lower caste people basic rights etc. That it does so while making you laugh, is its greatest strength.

After a street kid Phatka (Irrfan Khan) and his stray dog Bhidu begin cleaning cars in a rich locality, the rich, school going kids first try to fend him off, but later become great buddies. When a minister offended by the dog passes a law to ban all street dogs from Mumbai, the kids resort to some unconventional activism to save their beloved dog. But is it even possible for the powerless kids to take on a high and mighty minister?

“Chillar Party”, in essence, is a children’s film. But those who can read between the lines and see between pictures know that the most brilliant, imaginative and metaphorical literature and cinema in the world, are for kids.

Thus in literature you have your ‘The Prince’ and ‘Gulliver’s Travels’, while the films of Iranian auteurs, though simple and innocent, attack an unjust system. “Chillar Party” is a welcome addition to these greats of world cinema.

Yet, what does a children’s film need to be good? A simple story, good metaphor, oodles of cuteness and innocence, fun and humour and a band of actors to carry it all off. If you have these, any other drawbacks can be excused. “Chillar Party” has these and much more.

The film is filled with observations and idiosyncrasies that will leave you laughing your guts out. Every child in the film has acted with such restrained understatement that they give your popular stars a run for their money. And yet, beyond all these beautifully working elements, it is the metaphor of the dog that takes the cake.

Unlike nature, the world of humans is full of seclusion. Thus a Bal Thackeray in the 1960s wants the South Indians, in the 1990s the Muslims, and now the North Indians out of Mumbai. Fanatic Hindus want Muslims out of India. The Americans wanted blacks out of America. The Australians want Indians out. The Sri Lankans want the Tamils out. The list is literally endless. But as the film so valiantly, sincerely and emotionally argues, what is needed is inclusion.

“Chillar Party is filled with allegorical moments that hint at how the poor, the disenfranchised, the adivasi, the handicapped, the minority survive. When the rich kids take away his cleaning cloth, Phatka has no qualms about washing cars with his only tshirt. The rich consider poor to be pests and want them out, but the poor strive and ironically serve the same rich. Some, pushed to the edge, take up arms against mighty odds, like in the tribal belts of India.

Besides saluting the creative genius of writer-director Vikas Bahl and Nitesh Tiwari, one has to bow to UTV and Salman Khan, for flexing their muscles for something so beautiful.

“Chiller Party” may be a small film. But as cinema goes, in its adroitness, it is much more mature than 99 percent of the films ever made in India. And that, you’ll reckon, is no ’small’ achievement.

Film: “Chillar Party”
Cast: Irrfan Khan, Sanath Menon and Naman Jain

Director: Vikas Bahl, Nitesh Tiwari

Movie review - Transformers: Dark of the Moon (3D)

You have watched many English and Urdu movies but this movie is undeliverable.You will forget to close your mouth through out the movie. Did the cinema audience  need another epic cinematic clash between Autobots and Decepticons? After the crushing disappointment of Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, I expected the series to lay low but I probably did not account for Michael Bay's enthusiasm and the studio's greed for lucre.

Dark of the Moon is coherent -- every little detail is explained to everyone's satisfaction but the lay-up towards the final climactic plunge is so boredom enhancing that you would find it difficult to stay awake behind your 3D glasses.

The film is about the war between the Autobots and Decepticons, shape-shifting fighting machines belonging to fierce extraterrestrial rival tribes. Of course the villainous Decepticons are intent to secure Earth in order to support their home Planet Cybertron. Optimus Prime wants to revive Sentinel Prime from his ancient slumber.

Sam Witwicky (LaBeouf) jobless in Washington DC, living with hot gf Carly (Huntington-Whiteley), and temporarily abandoned by Bumblebee, jumps into the fray and soon butts heads with national intelligence director Charlotte Mearing (Frances McDormand).

Revisionist history also proclaims that John F Kennedy fast-tracked the moon landing in order to secure a site where a giant Autobot vessel had crash-landed after a war on Cybertron.

But that is not a piece of history you can care for here. The overly-detailed script by Ehren Kruger is more like an encyclopaedia on the world of Autobots and Decpticons, than a high-octane action movie script. The narrative plays out smoothly but it's a tedious wait before the advent of advanced CGI wizardy can make a show of it at the end. Each frame takes longer to move on  and the 3D enhanced shape-shifting, though it is cohesively done, fails to enthuse.

Actually there is not enough energy in the set-up and development to justify the all-out action towards the end. It's hard to sit still watching metallic characters hammering one another in a unnecessarily protracted battle (ironically held at the corner of Michigan Avenue and Wacker Drive in Chicago) for the Universe.

The attempt to boost-up the action towards the finale with an almost orgiastic pile-up of machines and humans looks quite hollow. The replacement for the luscious Megan Fox, British model Rosie Huntington Whitely  looks beautiful but she doesn't have either the  magnetic screen presence of her predecessor nor can she generate sizzling chemistry with co-star Shia. So that appears to be another spanner in the wheels of this mega fantasy in Imax 3D. Just Too bad!

Murder 2 with Lates Honest Movie review

You will find many review websites but this blog is my personal thinking reviews based.First i watch movie then i write these latest reviews.There are my own source to watch movies before time.So be with me to get lates reviews.Two films releasing this week. One a children's film, Chillar Party and another a juvenile film, Murder 2. Ex-cop Arjun Bhagwat (Emraan), with a perpetually bad wig hair day, walks around wounded and with an I-am-a-victim expression, because mind you, 20 long years back his family had committed suicide, for no fault of anyone's.

And he generally hates God. However, he being a hero, he protects pimps, call girls and the likes, and gives away thick envelopes of his hard earned money to poor people. Robin Hood would have been confused.

Dhiraj Yadav (Prashant Narayan) is a serial killer. Though Prashant is pretty convincing in his menacing role, for God-knows-what-reason his character likes to dress up as a woman, when he is in the mood to kill and chop up bodies of call girls and sex workers. When the credits roll, with blood splattered around the names, you kind of brace yourself with a sinking heart, for the kind of movie that is to follow. But even that doesn't prepare you for a really tacky item song by Yana Gupta and a lot of other things.

To its credit, the first half of the film manages to hold your interest, as you get involved with Reshma's life, a college student turned call girl, who manages to land herself in the clutches of a serial killer. You guessed it right; Reshma is pure but helpless, because she has to provide for her mother and two sisters. This story of one night has Arjun looking for Reshma, even while oscillating between making out with girlfriend Priya (Jaqueline) and trying to ward off her attention. 

Once he catches Dhiraj, he is out again wandering aimlessly, looking for evidence against him. In the second half, the director totally loses his sense of direction, and we have to be happy with gallons of 'blood' oozing out everywhere, with intermittent screeches of different girls.

Priya's body has a better role than her face. Poor girl didn't even get the advantage of her dialogues being in sync with her lip movement. Add to that the two and half dialogues that she has are repetitive ¦ Mohabbat ya zaroorat?, she keeps asking to Emraan's in expressive retort, Aadat.

This one has no mohabbat, not surely a zaroorat and probably just an aadat for the Bhatts to come out with a movie now and then, with a staple fare of explicit sex scenes and graphic violence in the name of a thrilling movie.